Portrait not available

Born in United States · Nationality American — organised crime / Chicago Outfit / labour racketeering / taxation / federal investigations

Murray Humphreys

Documented profile covering 8 controversies, including “1965: Indicted for perjury before grand jury; arrested, then dies before trial” and “1951: Repeated refusal to answer Kefauver Committee questions and referral for contempt of Senate”.

Are you concerned? Right of reply

Profile No. 2192 · Updated on 13 October 2026

8Documented controversies
6Sources
· 1 followed by a conviction ·

I. Documented controversies

01

23 November 1965

1965: Indicted for perjury before grand jury; arrested, then dies before trial

Formally charged — against a third party

Protagonist not prosecuted — these proceedings are not counted in their formal charges or convictions.

Humphreys was indicted for perjury relating to testimony before a federal grand jury. Federal agents arrested him on 23 November 1965; he died a few hours after being released on bail.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Accused
Role of the person profiled
Protagonist not prosecuted

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    U.S. Congress / GovInfoCongressional Record — organized-crime enforcement summary mentioning Murray HumphreysParliamentary recordVery high reliability
  2. [2]
    Federal Bureau of Investigation — The VaultClyde Tolson Part 07 — November 24, 1965 memorandumVery high reliability

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

02

28 May–25 June 1951

1951: Repeated refusal to answer Kefauver Committee questions and referral for contempt of Senate

No legal proceedings

Brought before the Senate organised crime committee, Humphreys repeatedly refused to answer questions deemed relevant by the committee. It adopted a report finding him in contempt and requested referral to the US Attorney for the District of Columbia.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Protagonist is a witness

Sources · 1

  1. [1]

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

03

21 December 1931–1942

December 1931: Receives $50,000 ransom following kidnapping of Robert Fitchie

No legal proceedings

The tax court accepted testimony that Humphreys collected the $50,000 deposited as ransom following the kidnapping of Robert C. Fitchie, president of the Milk Wagon Drivers Union. The sum was included in his taxable income.

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / JustiaHumphreys v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 125 F.2d 340Court recordVery high reliability

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

04

28 January–18 February 1942

1942: Tax deficiencies and fraud penalties upheld on several sources of illicit income

Civil / administrative proceedings

The Seventh Circuit upheld the tax decision covering 1930 to 1932, including a 25% penalty for 1930 and 50% fraud penalties for all three years, based on income from several sources that had not been properly declared.

Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / JustiaHumphreys v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 125 F.2d 340Court recordVery high reliability

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

05

1935–18 October 1940

1935–1940: Alleged takeover of Bartenders' Union and conspiracy indictment

Formally charged

FBI archives reproducing Cook County court records indicate that a former Bartenders' Union leader testified that Nitti, Humphreys and other Capone gang members had gradually taken control of the union between 1935 and 1940. Humphreys and several others were indicted on 18 October 1940 for conspiracy connected with that takeover.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Accused

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Federal Bureau of Investigation — The VaultJohn (Handsome Johnny) Roselli Part 1 of 12 — Chicago syndicate and union recordsVery high reliability

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

06

June 1933–26 October 1934

1933–1934: Tax indictment, flight for more than a year and subsequent guilty plea

Conviction

Humphreys was indicted in 1933 for attempting to evade income tax on earnings from 1930 to 1932. The subsequent appellate record states that he fled and remained a fugitive for more than a year, then returned from Mexico and pleaded guilty unconditionally on 26 October 1934 before being imprisoned.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / JustiaHumphreys v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 125 F.2d 340Court recordVery high reliability

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

07

1 November 1932–21 October 1933

1932–1933: Concealed weapons conviction overturned because arrest and search were unlawful

Acquitted / conviction overturned

Arrested without a warrant while committing no apparent offence, Humphreys was searched and a loaded automatic pistol was found beneath his waistcoat. He received a one-year prison sentence and a $300 fine.

Attribution
Accused
Course of the proceedings
  1. Formally charged — Formal charge before the current outcome

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Supreme Court of Illinois / CaseMineThe People v. Humphreys — judgment reversedCourt recordVery high reliability

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

08

1929–1931

1929–1931: Protection payments in dry-cleaning industry and acquisition of interest in Drexel Cleaners

Civil / administrative proceedings

In subsequent tax litigation, the court found that Humphreys had received $10,000 from dry-cleaning business owners for protection against labour trouble, then an interest valued at $5,000 in Drexel Cleaners, in circumstances where its operator feared further problems if Humphreys withdrew from the arrangement.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / JustiaHumphreys v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 125 F.2d 340Court recordVery high reliability

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

II. Constellation of documented links

No documented link with another published profile for now.

Two profiles are linked when a documented controversy of one names the other. The link points to that controversy and its sources; it does not indicate a personal relationship.

III. Has something changed?

A new court decision, a missing source, a mistake? Tell us what should be updated: every request is read by the editorial team.

Support the archive

Controversia checks and updates its profiles independently. Support is optional and has no effect on the content of profiles.

Donate

iPhone and iPad

Install Controversia

  1. Tap Share
  2. then Add to Home Screen

Tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.