Portrait of Tony Accardo

Photo: Associated Press · Public domain

Born in United States · Nationality American — Chicago Outfit / gambling / rackets / Senate investigations / taxation

Tony Accardo

Documented profile covering 8 controversies, including “1984: immunised Senate testimony, denials of Mafia involvement and longstanding refusal to cooperate” and “1982: acquitted in Laborers Union funds RICO case”.

Are you concerned? Right of reply

Profile No. 1964 · Updated on 12 October 2026

Portrait of Tony Accardo

Photo: Associated Press · Public domain

8Documented controversies
9Sources
0Conviction

I. Documented controversies

01

21 June 1984

1984: immunised Senate testimony, denials of Mafia involvement and longstanding refusal to cooperate

No legal proceedings

Before a Senate subcommittee investigating organised crime, Accardo acknowledged social relationships with several men described as Mafia members but denied controlling anyone or knowing about their criminal activities.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Protagonist is a witness

Sources · 1

  1. [1]

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

Case · 2 documented stages

1982: acquitted in Laborers Union funds RICO case

Acquitted / conviction overturned
02

1982

1982: acquitted in Laborers Union funds RICO case

Acquitted / conviction overturned

Accardo was acquitted at the RICO trial concerning kickbacks from Laborers Union funds, while several other defendants were convicted.

State of the evidence
Documented
Legal status — source text
Acquitted / conviction overturned
Attribution
Accused

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    U.S. Department of Justice / NCJRS-OJPFederal organized crime case summary — United States v. Anthony AccardoOfficial documentVery high reliability
  2. [2]
    U.S. Department of Labor OIGSemiannual Report to Congress April 1 - September 30, 1982Official documentVery high reliability

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

03

June 1981

1981: RICO indictment in major hidden kickbacks case involving Laborers Union funds

Acquitted / conviction overturned

Accardo was indicted alongside union officials and other alleged organised crime figures in a federal case involving nearly $2 million in kickbacks linked to insurance and benefit funds of the Laborers International Union.

Attribution
Accused

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    U.S. Department of Justice / NCJRS-OJPFederal organized crime case summary — United States v. Anthony AccardoOfficial documentVery high reliability

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

04

1978

1978: burglary of home followed by series of murders of suspected burglars — unproven suspicions of retaliation by Accardo

No legal proceedings

After Accardo's home was burgled, several men suspected of taking part in the theft were found murdered over the following months. Investigators and historians long suspected an Outfit retaliation campaign connected with the incident.

Attribution
Command responsibility

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    Los Angeles TimesTony Accardo; Reputed Chicago Mob BossPressHigh reliability
  2. [2]

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

05

années 1930–1970

1930s–1970s: leadership role in Chicago Outfit attributed by FBI and public commissions

No legal proceedings

FBI files, commissions and major media outlets described Accardo as one of the most powerful leaders of the Chicago Outfit, with alleged interests in gambling, loan-sharking and other rackets. He always denied being a 'boss' or controlling the organisation.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    Los Angeles TimesTony Accardo; Reputed Chicago Mob BossPressHigh reliability

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

Case · 2 documented stages

1962: tax conviction overturned on appeal, followed by acquittal at retrial

Acquitted / conviction overturned
06

January–1962

1962: tax conviction overturned on appeal, followed by acquittal at retrial

Acquitted / conviction overturned

The Seventh Circuit overturned the 1960 conviction because of prejudicial errors, including the admission of certain earlier tax evidence. Accardo was subsequently acquitted at his retrial.

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / JustiaUnited States v. Anthony Joseph Accardo, 298 F.2d 133Court decisionVery high reliability
  2. [2]
    The Washington PostLetter from the Big Tuna's home townPressHigh reliability

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

07

1960

1960: convicted of false tax statements and sentenced to six years

Acquitted / conviction overturned

Accardo was found guilty on three counts relating to false statements in his 1956–1958 tax returns concerning employment and car expenses at Premium Beer Sales. He was sentenced to six years in prison and fined $15,000.

State of the evidence
Established by a court
Attribution
Directly implicated
Course of the proceedings
  1. Formally charged — Formal charge before the current outcome

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / JustiaUnited States v. Anthony Joseph Accardo, 298 F.2d 133Court decisionVery high reliability
  2. [2]
    Los Angeles TimesTony Accardo; Reputed Chicago Mob BossPressHigh reliability

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

08

1951

1951: Senate contempt proceedings following Kefauver organised crime investigation

No legal proceedings

The Kefauver Committee initiated contempt of the Senate proceedings against Accardo over his answers or refusals to answer questions during the national organised crime investigation.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Protagonist is a witness

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    U.S. Congress / Library of CongressProceedings against Anthony J. Accardo for contempt of the SenateParliamentary recordVery high reliability
  2. [2]

Last verified: 14 September 2026

Add to this entry

II. Constellation of documented links

No documented link with another published profile for now.

Two profiles are linked when a documented controversy of one names the other. The link points to that controversy and its sources; it does not indicate a personal relationship.

III. Has something changed?

A new court decision, a missing source, a mistake? Tell us what should be updated: every request is read by the editorial team.

Support the archive

Controversia checks and updates its profiles independently. Support is optional and has no effect on the content of profiles.

Donate

iPhone and iPad

Install Controversia

  1. Tap Share
  2. then Add to Home Screen

Tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.