Chloe Ting

Chloe Ting said she brought civil proceedings against an individual and a company over posts that allegedly harmed her reputation. The action followed online accusations about her workout content and business. Ting was the claimant rather than a criminal defendant; the parties’ identities and procedural details could not be independently checked against accessible court filings.

State of the evidence

Ting’s account and secondary reports; court pleadings were not independently obtained.

Legal status — source text

Civil action reportedly brought in 2021 and said to have settled by August 2023; no court order obtained.

Attribution

No allegation against Ting in this action: she sued third parties over allegedly defamatory remarks.

Person targeted by the proceedings

Auteur de publications critiquées et société éditrice visés par la plainte

Role of the person profiled

Protagonist is the complainant

A Singapore-based trainer using the name @dinokang posted a long series of statements criticising the titles, nutritional claims and exercise form in Chloe Ting’s workouts. Debate focused on promises of quick results and unrealistic body-image expectations. Ting said the criticism distorted her content and cited input from a psychologist and a dietitian.

State of the evidence

Public accusations and replies reported by Coconuts and Mothership; no court finding on programme efficacy.

Legal status — source text

No judicial proceedings identified in relation to this incident.

Attribution

Public scrutiny of workout titles and advice; no fraud by Ting has been established.