Portrait of Louis Farrakhan

Photo: Mohammad Ali Marizad · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Born in United States · Nationality American — Nation of Islam / religion / ideology / politics

Louis Farrakhan

Documented profile covering 11 controversies, including “2023–2025: defamation lawsuit against ADL and Simon Wiesenthal Center dismissed, dismissal upheld on appeal and certiorari denied” and “2020–2024: campaign against Covid-19 vaccines, portrayed as depopulation plot and 'death itself'”.

Are you concerned? Right of reply

Profile No. 2530 · Updated on 12 October 2026

Portrait of Louis Farrakhan

Photo: Mohammad Ali Marizad · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

11Documented controversies
17Sources
0Formal charge · all time
0Conviction

I. Documented controversies

01

October 2023–6 October 2025

2023–2025: defamation lawsuit against ADL and Simon Wiesenthal Center dismissed, dismissal upheld on appeal and certiorari denied

Allegations

Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam sued the ADL, Jonathan Greenblatt, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and Abraham Cooper, contesting, among other matters, their characterisation as antisemitic and alleging First Amendment violations. The federal court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the entire complaint in April 2024. The Second Circuit upheld the dismissal in January 2025 and the Supreme Court declined to hear the case in October 2025.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Protagonist is the complainant

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    Justia / U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y.Farrakhan et al v. Anti-Defamation League et al — Opinion and OrderCourt decisionVery high reliability
  2. [2]
    Supreme Court of the United StatesDocket for 24-1236 — Louis Farrakhan, et al. v. Anti-Defamation League, et al.Court recordVery high reliability

Last verified: 15 September 2026

Add to this entry

02

July 2020–February 2024

2020–2024: campaign against Covid-19 vaccines, portrayed as depopulation plot and 'death itself'

No legal proceedings

Farrakhan repeatedly urged Black audiences to reject Covid-19 vaccines, portraying them as a possible depopulation operation, toxic substances or 'death itself'. Later speeches continued to link vaccination to a plan targeting Black populations.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Last verified: 15 September 2026

Add to this entry

03

4 July 2020

2020: 'The Criterion' speech — Jews described as 'Satan' and conspiracy allegations

No legal proceedings

In his nearly three-hour speech entitled 'The Criterion', Farrakhan called certain Jews and ADL leader Jonathan Greenblatt 'Satan' and repeated several collective accusations and conspiracy theories about Jews, Israel and political power.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    The Final Call / Nation of IslamThe CriterionStatementPrimary source
  2. [2]
    Anti-Defamation LeagueFarrakhan Remains Most Popular Antisemite in AmericaHigh reliability

Last verified: 15 September 2026

Add to this entry

04

November 2017–February 2019

2017–2019: series of remarks about 'Satanic Jews', Hollywood and 'termites', followed by removal of content for hate speech

No legal proceedings

In several speeches and posts between 2017 and 2019, Farrakhan repeated theories of Jewish control, attributed sexual and entertainment practices to Talmudic or Jewish influence and, in October 2018, responded to accusations of antisemitism with the expression 'anti-termite'. Facebook removed the corresponding video for breaching its hate speech policies.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    Anti-Defamation LeagueFarrakhan: In His Own WordsHigh reliability
  2. [2]

Last verified: 15 September 2026

Add to this entry

05

2 May 2019

2019: permanent ban from Facebook and Instagram as 'dangerous'

Civil / administrative proceedings

Facebook announced Louis Farrakhan's permanent exclusion from Facebook and Instagram under its policies on people and organisations deemed 'dangerous'. The company cited its rules concerning hatred and dangerous individuals.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]

Last verified: 15 September 2026

Add to this entry

06

24 June 2010

2010: letter to Jewish leaders alleging historical responsibility and warning of decline in their 'power and influence'

No legal proceedings

In a letter addressed to the ADL and several Jewish organisations, among others, Farrakhan repeated allegations about the historical role of Jews in slavery and the oppression of Black people and warned that opposition to his work would lead, in his view, to 'disgrace and ruin' and the destruction of their power and influence.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    Nation of IslamLetter to ADL Director, Abraham FoxmanStatementPrimary source

Last verified: 15 September 2026

Add to this entry

07

1964–May 2000

1964–2000: hostile rhetoric towards Malcolm X before assassination, followed by acknowledgement of possible 'complicity in words'

Allegations

Following Malcolm X's break with the Nation of Islam, Farrakhan participated in a public campaign denouncing him. In 2000, speaking to Attallah Shabazz in a CBS interview, Farrakhan acknowledged that his own words might have contributed to the atmosphere preceding the assassination and expressed regret.

State of the evidence
Documented

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    CBS NewsWho killed Malcolm X?PressHigh reliability

Last verified: 15 September 2026

Add to this entry

08

January–August 1996

1996: tour of sanctioned countries and proposed acceptance of $1 billion from Muammar Gaddafi — US Treasury refuses

Civil / administrative proceedings

After an international tour including Libya, Iran, Iraq and Sudan, Farrakhan confirmed a funding pledge from Muammar Gaddafi and applied for permission to accept a $1 billion donation and an award carrying $250,000. The US Treasury refused authorisation under the sanctions regime against Libya.

Attribution
Protagonist is the complainant

Last verified: 15 September 2026

Add to this entry

09

June 1984–March 1990

1984–1990: controversy over expression 'dirty religion' applied to Judaism and Israeli policy

No legal proceedings

In a June 1984 speech, Farrakhan associated the State of Israel with injustice, lies and theft and used the expression 'dirty religion'. He subsequently repeated and defended this formulation, drawing considerable political and religious condemnation.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 2

  1. [1]
    The Washington PostJackson Denounces FarrakhanPressHigh reliability
  2. [2]
    The Washington PostFarrakhan Seeks Larger Role in U.S. PoliticsPressHigh reliability

Last verified: 15 September 2026

Add to this entry

10

11 March–5 April 1984

1984: warning to Milton Coleman that he would be 'punished by death', followed by denial of physical threat

No legal proceedings

After Washington Post journalist Milton Coleman revealed Jesse Jackson's 'Hymie/Hymietown' remarks, Farrakhan denounced Coleman on the radio and said he would one day be 'punished by death'. Several weeks later, Farrakhan telephoned Coleman to say he had never intended to threaten his life or that of his family.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]
    The Washington PostAsks to Meet Reporter — Muslim Denies Threat on LifePressHigh reliability

Last verified: 15 September 2026

Add to this entry

11

March–April 1984

1984: remarks describing Hitler as a 'very great man', later qualified as 'wickedly great'

No legal proceedings

Amid the controversies of 1984, Farrakhan said Hitler had been a 'very great man', referring to Germany's reconstruction. When questioned later, he added that Hitler had also been 'wicked' and reformulated his assessment as 'wickedly great'.

State of the evidence
Documented
Attribution
Directly implicated

Sources · 1

  1. [1]

Last verified: 15 September 2026

Add to this entry

II. Constellation of documented links

  • Linked profile (portrait or initials) — click to open it
  • Line width: number of documented references
  • Hover over or tap a line: controversies and sources

Two profiles are linked when a documented controversy of one names the other. The link points to that controversy and its sources; it does not indicate a personal relationship.

List of documented links (4)
  1. Jesse Jackson2 documented references
  2. Hakeem Jeffries1 documented reference
  3. Sadiq Khan1 documented reference
  4. Tom Metzger1 documented reference

III. Has something changed?

A new court decision, a missing source, a mistake? Tell us what should be updated: every request is read by the editorial team.

Support the archive

Controversia checks and updates its profiles independently. Support is optional and has no effect on the content of profiles.

Donate

iPhone and iPad

Install Controversia

  1. Tap Share
  2. then Add to Home Screen

Tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.